COMPARISON AMONG DNA-POLYMERASE-1, DNA-POLYMERASE-2 AND DNA-POLYMERASE-3 FROM MAIZE EMBRYO AXES - A DNA PRIMASE ACTIVITY COPURIFIES WITH DNA-POLYMERASE 2
E. Garcia et al., COMPARISON AMONG DNA-POLYMERASE-1, DNA-POLYMERASE-2 AND DNA-POLYMERASE-3 FROM MAIZE EMBRYO AXES - A DNA PRIMASE ACTIVITY COPURIFIES WITH DNA-POLYMERASE 2, Plant molecular biology, 33(3), 1997, pp. 445-455
Three DNA polymerase activities, named 1, 2 and 3 were purified from m
aize embryo axes and were compared in terms of ion requirements, optim
al pH, temperature and KCl for activity, response to specific inhibito
rs and use of templates. All three enzymes require a divalent cation f
or activity, but main differences were observed in sensitivity to inhi
bitors and template usage: while DNA polymerases 1 and 2 were inhibite
d by N-ethyl maleimide and aphidicolin, inhibitors of replicative-type
enzymes, DNA polymerase 3 was only marginally or not affected at all.
In contrast, DNA polymerase 3 was highly inhibited by very low concen
trations of ddTTP, an inhibitor of repair-type enzymes, and a 100-fold
higher concentration of the drug was needed to inhibit DNA polymerase
s I and 2. Additionally, DNA polymerases 1 and 2 used equally or more
efficiently the synthetic template polydA-oligodT: as compared to acti
vated DNA, while polymerase 3 used it Very poorly. Whereas DNA polymer
ases 1 and 2 shared properties of replicative-type enzymes, DNA polyme
rase 3 could be a repair-type enzyme. Moreover, a DNA primase activity
copurified with the 8000-fold purified DNA polymerase 2, strenghtenin
g the suggestion that polymerase 2 is a replicative enzyme, of the alp
ha-type. This DNA primase activity was also partially characterized. T
he results are discussed in terms of relevant data about other plant D
NA polymerases and primases reported in the literature.