K. Haug et al., IS SMOKING INTERVENTION IN GENERAL-PRACTICE MORE SUCCESSFUL AMONG PREGNANT THAN NONPREGNANT WOMEN, Family practice, 11(2), 1994, pp. 111-116
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a simple smo
king intervention programme, carried out by a large number of general
practitioners (GPs) among pregnant and non-pregnant women. Four groups
of women were defined by the dichotomies pregnant versus non-pregnant
and intervention versus control. The intervention was semistructured,
using a flip-over and a booklet, and it was implemented in an ordinar
y sequence of consultations. The study involved 187 GPs in western Nor
way. The subjects were 350 daily smoking pregnant women and 274 daily
smoking non-pregnant women, 18-34 years of age. The point prevalence a
bstinence rate at 18 months was 15 and 20% for pregnant and non-pregna
nt women, respectively, in the intervention groups, and 7% in the cont
rol groups (P(pregnant) = 0.06, P(non-pregnant) = 0.006). Twenty-five
per cent of the pregnant women and 34% of the non-pregnant women repor
ted that they had reduced their cigarette consumption, but had not sto
pped smoking entirely. If we include all drop-outs as smokers, the con
tinuous abstinence rate during 15 months was 6%/0% among pregnant wome
n (intervention/control) and 5%/1% among non-pregnant women. Stopping
smoking was associated with having a non-smoking partner (P = 0.001),
and being encouraged to do so by their partner (P = 0.004). The preval
ence of both pregnant and non-pregnant women who stopped smoking was h
igher in the intervention than in the control groups. Pregnant women s
topped smoking as frequently as non-pregnant individuals. However, con
cerning mean daily cigarette consumption, a positive effect of the int
ervention was only observed for the non-pregnant women. There is a pot
ential for more women to become non-smokers during the periods of preg
nancy and child infancy. GPs should receive more training in this spec
ific health promotion effort. More effective, low cost smoking interve
ntion programmes, designed for pregnant women should be explored.