Cd. Pond et al., GENERAL-PRACTITIONER DIAGNOSIS OF DEPRESSION AND DEMENTIA IN THE ELDERLY - CAN ACADEMIC DETAILING MAKE A DIFFERENCE, Family practice, 11(2), 1994, pp. 141-147
The objective was to improve the ability of general practitioners (GPs
) to diagnose depression and dementia compared with standard screening
measures. The setting was a retirement village on the outskirts of Sy
dney, Australia. The study used a prepost design with a 6 month follow
-up. The intervention involved a visit to the GP by an academic detail
er who spent 15 minutes discussing the diagnosis of depression and dem
entia. Ratings of depression and dementia on two occasions by GPs, and
by independent interviews were made using the Geriatric Depression Sc
ale, Mini-mental State Examination and Canberra Interview for the Elde
rly. In the case of depression, the level of agreement (Kappa) between
the GPs and all instruments increased significantly by a factor of be
tween 2.3 and 3.3. The doctors did not significantly improve in their
agreement with the instruments on the diagnosis of dementia. An academ
ic detailing approach to improving GPs' abilities in the diagnosis of
depression can be effective. A controlled trial would be justified to
confirm this finding.