C. Gifford et Dv. Coleman, QUALITY ASSURANCE IN CERVICAL-CANCER SCREENING - RESULTS OF A PROFICIENCY TESTING SCHEME FOR CYTOLOGY LABORATORIES IN THE NORTH-WEST THAMESREGION, Cytopathology, 5(4), 1994, pp. 197-206
Objectives. To examine the effectiveness of introducing External Quali
ty Assessment (EQA) into all laboratories which undertake gynaecologic
al cytopathology. To assess pathologists and cytotechnologists regular
ly for their competence to screen cervical smears, regardless of their
standing in the laboratory hierarchy or their experience of gynaecolo
gical cytopathology. Methods. Each participant was asked to screen and
report on 10 slides during a 2 h period. The assessment was carried o
ut by a facilitator under the direction of a specially appointed EQA C
ommittee. A maximum score of 20 points was awarded for a completely co
rrect set of answers. A minus score was awarded for a missed abnormal
smear. Seventeen pathology laboratories in North West Thames Regional
Health Authority participated; 146 cytologists were assessed. Results.
A pilot and four rounds of EQA have been completed and a total 5350 s
mears examined. Out of 2568 dyskaryotic (abnormal) smears screened, 0.
7% were not identified correctly. Of the 146 cytologists taking part i
n the assessment, 95% achieved a score of 17 or more. Three participan
ts were identified who did not reach an acceptable level of competence
and appropriate remedial action was taken. Conclusion. The EQA scheme
detected unacceptable levels of performance which can be quickly rect
ified. Participation of 100% has been maintained on a voluntary basis,
and 4 years experience of the scheme confirms that a very high standa
rd of screening prevails in the Region. The study illustrates that vol
untary self-regulation is acceptable in the NHS, and the introduction
of similar EQA schemes on a national scale will go a long way to estab
lishing confidence in the cervical cancer screening programme.