The orthodoxy that conditional probabilities reflect what are for a su
bject evidential bearings is seconded. This significance suggests that
there should be principles equating rationally revised probabilities
on new information with probabilities reached by conditionalizing on t
his information. Several principles, two of which are endorsed, are co
nsidered. A 'book' is made against a violator of these, and it is argu
ed that there must be something wrong with a person against whom such
books can be made. Appendices comment on Popper-functions, elaborate o
n bets and odds, and relate dutch books and strategies to conditions o
f inconsistency (Ramsey's idea) and imperfection.