Dj. Defriend et al., EFFECTS OF 4-HYDROXYTAMOXIFEN AND A NOVEL PURE ANTIESTROGEN (ICI-182780) ON THE CLONOGENIC GROWTH OF HUMAN BREAST-CANCER CELLS IN-VITRO, British Journal of Cancer, 70(2), 1994, pp. 204-211
We have investigated the effects on breast cancer cell growth of 4-hyd
roxytamoxifen (4OHT), a conventional antioestrogen with agonist activi
ty, and 7 opentylsulphinyl)nonyl]oestra-1,3,5,(10)-triene-3, 17 beta-d
iol (ICI 182780), a novel, pure antioestrogen, using established human
breast cancer cell lines and cancer cells obtained directly from brea
st cancer patients with malignant pleural effusions who had relapsed o
n tamoxifen. The effects of the two agents were assessed using the Cou
rtenay-Mills clonogenic assay, which measures the growth of single can
cer cells as colonies suspended in soft agar. The standard assay was m
odified by the use of defined serum- and phenol red-free growth medium
. The growth of oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive MCF-7 cells in the as
say was oestrogen responsive. Both antioestrogens inhibited the stimul
atory effects of 1 nM oestradiol, but ICI 182780 caused significantly
greater inhibition than 4OHT at 0.1-1.0 mu M concentrations. In the ab
sence of oestradiol, 4OHT but not ICI 182780 caused significant stimul
ation of colony formation at low (0.01-1.00 nM) concentrations. Neithe
r antioestrogen had any effects on colony formation by the ER-negative
Hs578T cell line. Successful colony formation was obtained in primary
cultures from six out of eight malignant effusions. Colony formation
was significantly stimulated by 0.1 nM oestradiol in four cases and by
10 nM 40HT in two cases. In contrast, ICI 182780 exhibited no intrins
ic stimulatory activity and significantly inhibited both oestradiol- a
nd 40HT-stimulated cell growth. We conclude that the agonist activity
of 40HT and other conventional antioestrogens may cause treatment fail
ure in some patients by stimulating breast cancer cell growth. The new
, pure antioestrogen ICI 182780 is a more potent oestrogen antagonist
than 4OHT and exhibits no growth-stimulatory activity. This agent may
therefore offer therapeutic advantages over conventional antioestrogen
s in patients with advanced breast cancer and may be effective after c
onventional agents have failed.