Dd. Gladman et al., SENSITIVITY TO CHANGE OF 3 SYSTEMIC LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS DISEASE-ACTIVITY INDEXES - INTERNATIONAL VALIDATION, Journal of rheumatology, 21(8), 1994, pp. 1468-1471
Objective. Three indices, the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), the
Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM) and the British Isles Lupus As
sessment Group (BILAG), have been found to be reliable and valid measu
res of disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
(SLE). Our aim was to investigate their use and comparative ability to
assess change in disease activity over time. Methods. Clinical and la
boratory features of 8 patients with SLE on each of 3 consecutive visi
ts were abstracted and sent in 3 separate packages to physicians from
8 centers. The order of the patient visit summaries was randomized, an
d the 3 indices rated in one of 6 specific sequences. Results. The 3 i
ndices were significantly (p <0.01) correlated: SLEDAI/SLAM = 0.61, BI
LAG/SLAM = 0.55, SLEDAI/BILAG = 0.35. The sequence presented, the orde
r of patients and order of index scoring did not contribute significan
tly (p >0.05) to the variation of any of the 3 indices. All 3 indices
detected differences among patients (p <0.01). Differences between vis
its were detectable with SLEDAI (p = 0.03) but not with SLAM or BILAG.
Conclusion. Our study confirms that the SLEDAI, SLAM and BILAG are co
mparable disease activity measures. SLEDAI appears to be sensitive to
change in disease activity over time.