TOWARDS ACHIEVING THE HEALTH-OF-THE-NATION TARGET FOR CERVICAL-CANCER- ACCURACY OF CANCER REGISTRATION

Citation
G. Lancaster et al., TOWARDS ACHIEVING THE HEALTH-OF-THE-NATION TARGET FOR CERVICAL-CANCER- ACCURACY OF CANCER REGISTRATION, Journal of public health medicine, 16(1), 1994, pp. 50-52
Citations number
5
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
09574832
Volume
16
Issue
1
Year of publication
1994
Pages
50 - 52
Database
ISI
SICI code
0957-4832(1994)16:1<50:TATHTF>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
To measure the accuracy of incidence rates for invasive cervical cance r derived from cancer registration data, a review of histopathology re cords was undertaken for all cases of invasive cervical cancer, a 20 p er cent random sample of CIN 3 registrations and all cases of cancer o f the uterus not otherwise specified (NOS) from Greater Manchester, wh ich were registered by the North Western Regional Cancer Registry betw een 1988 and 1989. The subjects were 386 cases of invasive cervical ca ncer, 313 CIN 3 registrations and 69 cases of cancer of the uterus NOS . The main outcome measure was the incidence rate of invasive cervical cancer in Greater Manchester after adjusting for errors in cancer reg istration. It was found that 375 (97 per cent) of the 386 cases of inv asive cervical cancer were verified against the original pathology rep ort but 11 cases (3 per cent) had been registered as invasive cervical cancer in error. Nine cases of invasive cervical cancer were found to have been misclassified as CIN 3, and 10 cases as cancer of the uteru s NOS. As the CIN 3 cases were a 20 per cent random sample of all CIN 3 registrations, the best estimate of the number of cases of invasive cervical cancer misclassified as CIN 3 is 45, which makes a total unde r-registration of 55 cases over the two-year period. After adjusting f or under- and over-registration, the incidence rate of invasive cancer of the cervix in Greater Manchester for 1988-1989 increased from 16.5 to 18.1 per 100 000 population. These findings emphasize the need for accurate baseline data if progress towards the Health of the nation t arget is to be reliably monitored.