Ma. Janson et Cc. Woo, A SPEECH-ACT LEXICON - AN ALTERNATIVE USE OF SPEECH-ACT THEORY IN INFORMATION-SYSTEMS, Information systems journal, 6(4), 1996, pp. 301-329
Speech act theory focuses on pragmatic language qualities of making as
sertions, directions, promises, declarations and expressions. However,
assigning speech acts to one of a few categories is not without contr
oversy. The process is context dependent and, hence, individuals with
divergent contextual views may categorize speech acts differently. Dif
ferent categories, in turn, imply different speech act interpretations
. The difficulty of disparate speech act interpretations can often be
resolved by, for example, a process of negotiation. Nonetheless, it is
easy to envisage situations in which agreement by negotiation is not
possible. Such would be the case when a researcher studies transcribed
speech act performances. We propose that Ballmer and Brennenstuhl's (
1981) speech at classification method, which relies on an extensive sp
eech act verb lexicon with sequencing and contextual information, can
reduce disagreement among individuals who singly or together analyse a
nd ascribe meaning to speech acts. We base this proposition on the res
ults of exploratory research involving alternative knowledge acquisiti
on methods. Our exploratory results suggest that Ballmer and Brennenst
uhl's lexicon provides several promising future research directions of
speech act use in information systems.