Lh. Burns et al., GLUTAMATE-DOPAMINE INTERACTIONS IN THE VENTRAL STRIATUM - ROLE IN LOCOMOTOR-ACTIVITY AND RESPONDING WITH CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT, Psychopharmacology, 115(4), 1994, pp. 516-528
Previous evidence suggests that glutamatergic limbic afferents partici
pate in the potentiation of responding with conditioned reinforcement
produced by intra-accumbens d-amphetamine. The present experiments wer
e designed to investigate glutamate-dopamine interactions in the ventr
al striatum in both conditioned reinforcement and locomotor activity.
Glutamate receptor agonists and antagonists were infused into the nucl
eus accumbens both alone and in combination with 3 mu g d-amphetamine,
and the effects of these interactions on responding with conditioned
reinforcement and locomotor activity were measured. The glutamate rece
ptor agonists NMDA, AMPA and quisqualate (agonists at the NMDA, AMPA a
nd metabotropic glutamate receptor subtypes, respectively) and the ant
agonists AP5 and CNQX, (antagonists at the NMDA and AMPA receptor subt
ypes, respectively) were used in these investigations. These compounds
were used in a dose range of 0.3 to 3 nmol, except CNQX, which was us
ed in 0.2 to 2 nmol doses. While all agonists and antagonists increase
d locomotor activity when administered alone, the antagonists attenuat
ed the locomotor response to d-amphetamine. In contrast, the agonists
AMPA and quisqualate enhanced d-amphetamine-induced locomotor activity
, although NMDA interfered with the effects of d-amphetamine. In the c
onditioned reinforcement paradigm, both the agonists and the antagonis
ts abolished amphetamine's potentiation of responding with conditioned
reinforcement, suggesting that the glutamatergic transmission of info
rmation about the conditioned reinforcer could be blocked by glutamate
receptor antagonists and disrupted by administration of the agonists.
The dissociation between the effects of these excitatory amino acids
on amphetamine-induced locomotor activity versus their effects on amph
etamine's potentiation of responding with conditioned reinforcement pr
ovides insight into the nature of the reward enhancement by accumbens
dopamine versus its locomotor stimulant effects.