The objective of this study was to compare three methods of collecting
social class data in general practice. The setting was a rural dispen
sing practice on the Nottinghamshire/Lincolnshire border. The methods
examined were: (a) a self-administered questionnaire to 200 patients t
o determine their social class based on the occupation of the head of
household; (b) members of the practice staff were asked to assign a so
cial class to these households based on their local knowledge; and (c)
use of small area statistics from the 1991 census data using modal an
d weighted methods, It was found that the practice staff were unable r
eliably to assign a social class to the households. The modal method o
f using small area statistics to assign social class to households thr
ough their postcode and its link to the census data was also inaccurat
e. While a personal questionnaire will remain the only method for assi
gning a social class to individual patients for clinical care or most
research, the weighted method of small area statistics is shown to be
a cost-effective and sufficiently accurate method for health needs ass
essment in general practice.