Rm. Rourk et al., DIMINISHED LUMINAL RELEASE OF ESOPHAGEAL EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR IN PATIENTS WITH REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS, The American journal of gastroenterology, 89(8), 1994, pp. 1177-1184
Objectives: It has recently been demonstrated that human esophageal mu
cosa, containing numerous submucosal mucous glands, has the ability to
elaborate significant amounts of esophageal epidermal growth factor (
eEGF). Because of its role in the maintenance of the integrity of the
esophageal mucosa, we elected to study the rate of secretion of eEGF i
n patients with reflux esophagitis (RE), compared with controls, using
our newly developed esophageal perfusion model. Methods: Fourteen hea
lthy asymptomatic volunteers and 14 patients with endoscopically confi
rmed esophagitis underwent esophageal perfusion with saline, HCl (0.01
M, pH 2.1) HCl/pepsin (0.5 mg/ml of HCl), and ending NaCl solution du
ring four consecutive 8-min perfusion periods. All perfusates were ass
ayed for EGF by RIA (Amersham). Results are expressed as mean +/- SEM.
Student's t test was used for statistical analysis. Results: The basa
l rate of luminal EGF release in patients with RE was 3.78 +/- 0.29 ng
/min. This value significantly declined (2.27 +/- 0.27 ng/min; p < 0.0
01) during mucosal exposure to HCl but was significantly enhanced when
the HCl perfusing solution was supplemented with pepsin (4.20 +/- 0.2
9; p < 0.001 vs. HCl). Introduction of saline during the last perfusio
n period maintained a rate of luminal EGF release similar to that obse
rved during the initial esophageal perfusion with saline. Luminal rele
ase of EGF in patients with RE was significantly lower, compared with
corresponding values recorded in controls during perfusion with saline
(3.78 +/- 0.29 vs. 14.1 +/- 1.25 ng/min; p < 0.00001), with HCl (2.27
+/- 0.27 vs. 5.95 ng/min; p < 0.0001), with HCl/pepsin solution (4.2
+/- 0.29 vs. 11.7 +/- 1.88 ng/min; p < 0.0001), and during the final p
erfusion period with saline (3.73 +/- 0.25 vs. 15.1 +/- 1.1 ng/min; p
< 0.00001). Therefore, the rate of luminal EGF release in controls was
4-fold, 3-fold, 3-fold, and 4-fold higher than that of patients with
RE during perfusion with initial saline, HCl, HCl/pepsin, and final sa
line, respectively. Conclusions: 1) Decreased esophageal EGF in patien
ts with RE may facilitate the development or delay the healing of muco
sal injury. 2) Depletion of EGF from the mucus layer covering the epit
helium under the impact of refluxed luminal acid/pepsin may be conside
red as one of the potential underlying mechanisms leading to damage of
the esophageal mucosa during gastroesophageal reflux episodes.