REDUCED POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIC DEMAND AFTER INHALED ANESTHESIA IN COMPARISON TO COMBINED EPIDURAL-INHALED ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ABDOMINAL-SURGERY
Mg. Rockemann et al., REDUCED POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIC DEMAND AFTER INHALED ANESTHESIA IN COMPARISON TO COMBINED EPIDURAL-INHALED ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ABDOMINAL-SURGERY, Anesthesia and analgesia, 84(3), 1997, pp. 600-605
We studied the effect of epidural/general combination anesthesia, in c
omparison to inhaled anesthesia, on postoperative pain and analgesic c
onsumption in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery. Anesthesia
was induced with propofol and maintained with enflurane in 70% N2O as
necessary to maintain arterial blood pressure within 20% of baseline.
Group I received bupivacaine 0.25% 0.2 mL/kg and sufentanil 1 mu g/kg
65 +/- 3 min before dermal incision and 0.1 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% sufentanil 2 mu g/mL (BS) every hour thereafter. Group II received 0.2
mL/kg of BS 316 +/- 15 min after dermal incision in the recovery room
. Postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with BS w
as provided. Pain intensities and consumption of PCEA BS were recorded
on postoperative days (PODs) 1 to 5. Inspiratory fraction of enfluran
e was lower (0.5% +/- 0.01% vs 1.6% +/- 0.04%; P < 0.001) in Group I c
ompared with Group II, Cumulative postoperative consumption of PCEA BS
was higher in Group I compared with Group II from the evening of POD
2 until the end of the study (301 +/- 19 mt vs 249 +/- 17 mt; P < 0.00
1), while pain intensities were comparable at all times. The intraoper
ative effects of combined BS and enflurane/N2O (inspiratory fraction [
F-i] similar to 1 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration [MAC]) did
not preempt postoperative pain in contrast to enflurane/N2O anesthesi
a (F-i similar to 2.8 MAC).