COMPARING HYDROGEN TESTING METHODS FOR WROUGHT ALUMINUM

Citation
Xg. Chen et al., COMPARING HYDROGEN TESTING METHODS FOR WROUGHT ALUMINUM, JOM, 46(8), 1994, pp. 34-38
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Metallurgy & Mining",Mineralogy,"Material Science
Journal title
JOMACNP
ISSN journal
10474838
Volume
46
Issue
8
Year of publication
1994
Pages
34 - 38
Database
ISI
SICI code
1047-4838(1994)46:8<34:CHTMFW>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
In this study on selected wrought aluminum alloys, several commonly us ed methods for determining hydrogen were compared and verified with re gard to accuracy, reproducibility, and process-related limits. The two direct methods studied-the AlScan and CHAPEL (continuous hydrogn anal ysis by pressure evaluation in liquids) techniques-are able to quantit atively determine hydrogen content directly in the melt. In testing, b oth showed outstanding agreement with regard to accuracy and reproduci bility. Two analytical methods were also studied-vacuum solid extracti on and carrier fusion extraction. Both the direct and analytical metho ds yielded satisfactory agreement among the results. Also studied was an indication method, reduced-pressure testing, which is a quick and s imple method suitable for the qualitatively evaluating hydrogen conten t. Here, however, the relationship between the density index and the h ydrogen content of the melt is influenced by numerous factors.