In this study on selected wrought aluminum alloys, several commonly us
ed methods for determining hydrogen were compared and verified with re
gard to accuracy, reproducibility, and process-related limits. The two
direct methods studied-the AlScan and CHAPEL (continuous hydrogn anal
ysis by pressure evaluation in liquids) techniques-are able to quantit
atively determine hydrogen content directly in the melt. In testing, b
oth showed outstanding agreement with regard to accuracy and reproduci
bility. Two analytical methods were also studied-vacuum solid extracti
on and carrier fusion extraction. Both the direct and analytical metho
ds yielded satisfactory agreement among the results. Also studied was
an indication method, reduced-pressure testing, which is a quick and s
imple method suitable for the qualitatively evaluating hydrogen conten
t. Here, however, the relationship between the density index and the h
ydrogen content of the melt is influenced by numerous factors.