In Pelotas, Brazil, 400 newborns from low income families were followe
d-up until 26 wk of life to study the relationship between their feedi
ng patterns and growth as modified by access to water and by diarrhea.
Effects of access to water were the strongest among non-breastfed inf
ants. In houses without indoor water taps, the weight gain of non-brea
stfed infants during the first 3 mo was approximately half that of par
tially or predominantly breastfed infants (P < 0.001). In houses with
indoor water taps, non-breastfed infants' growth was similar to or exc
eeded that of predominantly breastfed infants from 2 mo. Predominantly
breastfed infants' growth was similar in houses with and without wate
r taps. Breastfed infants had less weight loss per day of diarrhea tha
n non-breastfed infants during the first 4 mo and less diarrhea throug
h 6 mo of life, particularly in houses without taps, in which diarrhea
was most prevalent. The existence of a ''weanling's dilemma'' was app
roached by comparing the duration of the detrimental effects of not br
eastfeeding (i.e., 0-3 mo in this study) with the age at which breast
milk alone becomes less than optimal for growth (i.e., at 5 mo). Becau
se these two points did not coincide, we conclude that there is no ''w
eanling's dilemma'' in this population.