V. Llaca et al., CHLOROPLAST DNA AS AN EVOLUTIONARY MARKER IN THE PHASEOLUS-VULGARIS COMPLEX, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 88(6-7), 1994, pp. 646-652
We have analyzed the changes occurring in the chloroplast DNA (cpDNA)
of taxa belonging to the Phaseolus vulgaris complex to help clarify re
lationships among species of this complex. Two restriction maps for 11
restriction enzymes comprising the whole chloroplast genome from a wi
ld P. vulgaris and a wild P. coccineus accession were constructed. The
se maps allowed us to compare a total of 330 restriction sites between
the two genomes in order to identify polymorphisms, assess the type o
f mutations detected, and identify regions of high variability. A regi
on, located in the large single-copy region near the borders with the
inverted repeats, accounted for a large portion of the variation. Most
of the mutations detected were due to restriction sites gains or loss
es. Variable and conserved regions were then evaluated in 30 accession
s belonging to taxa of the P. vulgaris complex. Phylogenetic analyses
were made using parsimony methods. Conclusions obtained from such anal
yses were the following: (1) there was high cpDNA variability within P
. coccineus but not in P. vulgaris. (2) P. coccineus subsp. glabellus
showed a very distinct cpDNA type that strongly suggests that it actua
lly belongs to a different but as yet undetermined section of the genu
s. Our cpDNA observations are supported by distinctive morphological t
raits and reproductive biology of this taxon. (3) In P. coccineus subs
p. darwinianus (also classified as P. polyanthus), the cpDNA lineage w
as in disagreement with data obtained from nuclear markers and suggest
ed a reticulated origin by hybridization between P. coccineus as the m
ale parent and an ancestral P. polyanthus type, closely allied to P. v
ulgaris, as the seed parent. This initial cross was presumably followe
d by repeated backcrossing to P. coccineus. Our cpDNA studies illustra
te the importance of molecular markers in elucidating phylogenetic rel
ationships. They also indicate that accurate phylogenies will require
analyses of both nuclear and cytoplasmic genomes.