G. Kill, A FUTURE IN COAL - VIABLE OR NOT, Transactions - Institution of Mining and Metallurgy. Section A. Mining industry, 103, 1994, pp. 10000104-10000116
Coal for power generation steam coal-is the major quality of coal trad
ed. Coal has a strong inter-relationship with oil (and gas), which aff
ects both its volume and price. Internationally traded coal and spot t
rading constitute only a small percentage of total world coal producti
on, but these sectors provide a particularly interesting basis for est
ablishing whether more sophisticated trading mechanisms, such as futur
es, could develop. Currently, long-term contracts dominate the coal ma
rket; other energy commodities, however, have developed successful fut
ures contracts. To establish whether coal markets will develop in the
same way coal price and volume data are tested against a set of criter
ia developed by Treat, which are considered to represent some of the f
actors that contribute to the development of a successful futures cont
ract. The criteria are, essentially, an ad-hoc list of commodity-based
characteristics, but Treat developed quantifiable limits against whic
h he tested data for energy futures contracts (oil and gas) to establi
sh why they had succeeded or failed. The criteria that have been used
to test coal's suitability for trading as a future are: price volatili
ty; uncertainty of supply and demand; product perishability; sufficien
cy of deliverable capacity; product homogeneity; market concentration;
availability of price information; uniqueness of trading opportunity;
market timing; and market liquidity. Although coal meets some of the
conditions represented by the criteria, it does not appear to be ready
for the launch of a futures contract. Market players are subject to l
ittle risk in what is quite a stable market, have strong preferences f
or the specific nature of long-term contracts and profit from product
uniqueness (each trade is individually negotiated). Potential structur
al changes in the western Europe market are not felt to be sufficient
to create demand for a coal futures contract. However, an empirical mo
del developed by Black could form the basis of a further study to pred
ict the potential for success of a proposed contract, although establi
shing the specifications of such a contract would require extensive da
ta gathering and discussions with players in the market.