Im. Khan et al., LIGAND SPECIFICITY OF NICOTINIC ACETYLCHOLINE-RECEPTORS IN RAT SPINAL-CORD - STUDIES WITH NICOTINE AND CYTISINE, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 270(1), 1994, pp. 159-166
Administration of nicotinic agonists to the spinal cord leads to a var
iety of cardiovascular and behavioral responses. The discrete localiza
tion of afferent and efferent fibers presents a system in which occupa
tion of nicotinic receptor subtypes might be correlated with specific
pharmacologic responses. To this end, we examined [H-3]cytisine and [H
-3]nicotine binding to membranes isolated from regions of the rat spin
al cord. [H-3]Cytisine showed saturable, noncooperative (n(H) similar
or equal to 1) binding to a single-class of sites with a K-d of 0.44 /- 0.01 nM and total saturable sites of 19.9 +/- 0.9 fmol/mg of protei
n. [H-3]Cytisine binding to membranes from intermediolateral cell colu
mn and dorsal and ventral sections of the lumbosacral regions each rev
ealed a single class of binding sites with virtually identical K-d val
ues. However, the dorsal sections of the lumbar spinal cord contained
a higher number of total binding sites than ventral lumbar or intermed
iolateral sections. The rank order potencies of the nicotinic agonists
competing for [H-3]cytisine binding was cytisine > l-nicotine > N-met
hylcarbamylcholine > dimethylphenylpiperazinium > acetylcholine > d-ni
cotine > carbamylcholine. Competitive antagonists also competed with h
igh affinities (K-i as low as nanomolar) with the order of potencies b
eing alpha-lobeline greater than or equal to dihydro-beta-erythroidine
>> methyllycaconitine, whereas the channel blockers, mecamylamine and
hexamethonium, only competed at concentrations greater than or equal
to 100 mu M. Competitive ganglionic blockers such as d-tubocurarine or
trimethaphan and neurotoxins such as alpha-bungarotoxin, alpha-cobrat
oxin or neuronal bungarotoxin had weak affinities for cytisine sites.
Similar to [H-3]cytisine, [H-3]nicotine also revealed a saturable sing
le class of binding sites, but of lower affinity. The rank order of K-
i values of the agonists, antagonists and neurotoxins for competing wi
th [H-3]nicotine binding was similar to the order for [H-3]cytisine. N
icotinic receptors in the spinal cord membranes show a specificity for
both agonists and antagonists that differ from neuronal receptors in
the ganglia or the regions of the brain characterized to date. These f
indings, when correlated with the pharmacological responses documented
in the companion article suggest that the spinal nicotinic receptors
may define a new member of the neuronal nicotinic receptor family.