Rs. Waldstein et Sr. Baum, PERCEPTION OF COARTICULATORY CUES IN THE SPEECH OF CHILDREN WITH PROFOUND HEARING-LOSS AND CHILDREN WITH NORMAL-HEARING, Journal of speech and hearing research, 37(4), 1994, pp. 952-959
Two experiments investigated the perception of coarticulatory cues in
the speech of children with profound hearing loss and children with no
rmal hearing. To examine anticipatory coarticulation, five repetitions
of the syllables [Si Su ti tu ki ku] produced by nine children with h
earing loss and nine children with normal hearing were edited to inclu
de only the aperiodic consonantal portion. To explore perseveratory co
articulation, comparable segments were excised from the syllables [iS
uS it ut ik uk]. The stimuli had been analyzed previously in two acous
tic studies of coarticulation (Baum & Waldstein, 1991; Waldstein & Bau
m, 1991). Ten listeners were presented with the aperiodic segment and
were asked to identify the missing vowel. Overall, listeners' vowel id
entification was better for the productions by children with normal he
aring than for those by children with hearing loss. In anticipatory co
ntexts, listeners were able to identify the absent vowel with better-t
han-chance accuracy for all productions by both groups except the [i]
tokens following [S] produced by children with hearing loss. In persev
eratory contexts, identification accuracy was significantly above chan
ce for all except the [i] tokens preceding [t] produced by children wi
th normal hearing, but only for [u] tokens produced by children with h
earing loss. Identification accuracy was better in anticipatory than i
n perseveratory contexts for both speaker groups' productions. The pat
terning of vowel identification, however, differed for the two speaker
groups in anticipatory but not perseveratory contexts.