DEVELOPMENT OF NESTED PCR ASSAYS FOR DETECTION OF BOVINE RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS IN CLINICAL-SAMPLES

Citation
S. Vilcek et al., DEVELOPMENT OF NESTED PCR ASSAYS FOR DETECTION OF BOVINE RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS IN CLINICAL-SAMPLES, Journal of clinical microbiology, 32(9), 1994, pp. 2225-2231
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
ISSN journal
00951137
Volume
32
Issue
9
Year of publication
1994
Pages
2225 - 2231
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-1137(1994)32:9<2225:DONPAF>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Two nested PCR assays were developed for the detection of bovine respi ratory syncytial virus (BRSV). Primers were selected from the gene enc oding the F fusion protein (PCR-F) and the gene encoding the G attachm ent protein (PCR-G). Biotinylated oligonucleotide probes, termed F and G, were selected for the hybridization of the respective PCR products . The sensitivities of the PCR-F and PCR-G assays were similar, both d etecting 0.1 tissue culture infective dose of the virus. The PCR-F ass ay amplified all bovine strains and one human strain (RS32) tested. No cross-reactions were observed, with nine heterologous respiratory vir uses. PCR-F products of bovine and human RSV strains were discriminate d by using endonuclease restriction enzyme ScaI, which specifically cl eaved products of BRSV. Oligonucleotide probe F was also specific for products of BRSV. The PCP-G assay detected all bovine strains and none of the human strains tested. A faint electrophoretic band was also ob served with products of Sendai virus. However, probe G did not hybridi ze with this product, only with products of BRSV. Nasal swabs collecte d from cattle with no symptoms and cattle in the acute stage of respir atory disease were analyzed for BRSV by the immunofluorescence (IF) me thod and by the PCR-F and PCR-G assays. The virus was detected by the PCR assays in 31 of 35 (89%) samples tested. Only 23 samples (66%) wer e positive by the IF method, and these samples were also positive by b oth the PCR-F and PCR-G assays. The 31 samples detected as positive by PCR originated from cattle presenting clinical signs of acute respira tory disease; the four PCR-negative samples originated from clinically asymptomatic neighboring cattle. All sampled animals subsequently ser oconverted and became reactive to BRSV. Thus, the detection of BRSV by PCR correlated with clinical observations and was considerably more s ensitive (66 versus 89%) than IF. These results indicate that both nes ted PCR assays provide rapid and sensitive means for the detection of BRSV infection in cattle. Considering its higher specificity, the PCR- F assay can be recommended as the method of choice in the analysis of clinical specimens of BRSV.