Interest in psychological experimentation from the Artificial Intellig
ence community often takes the form of rigorous post-hoc evaluation of
completed computer models. Through an example of our own collaborativ
e research, we advocate a different view of how psychology and Al may
be mutually relevant, and propose an integrated approach to the study
of learning in humans and machines. We begin with the problem of learn
ing appropriate indices for storing and retrieving information from me
mory. From a planning task perspective, the most useful indices may be
those that predict potential problems and access relevant plans in me
mory, improving the planner's ability to predict and avoid planning fa
ilures. This ''predictive features'' hypothesis is then supported as a
psychological claim, with results showing that such features offer an
advantage in terms of the selectivity of reminding because they more
distinctively characterize planning situations where differing plans a
re appropriate. We present a specific case-based model of plan executi
on, RUNNER, along with its indices for recognizing when to select part
icular plans-appropriateness conditions-and how these predictive indic
es serve to enhance learning. We then discuss how this predictive feat
ures claim as implemented in the RUNNER model is then tested in a seco
nd set of psychological studies. The results show that learning approp
riateness conditions results in greater success in recognizing when a
past plan is in fact relevant in current processing, and produces more
reliable recall of the related information. This form of collaboratio
n has resulted in a unique integration of computational and empirical
efforts to create a model of case-based learning.