TESTING RECKLESS DRIVERS FOR COCAINE AND MARIJUANA

Citation
D. Brookoff et al., TESTING RECKLESS DRIVERS FOR COCAINE AND MARIJUANA, The New England journal of medicine, 331(8), 1994, pp. 518-522
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
00284793
Volume
331
Issue
8
Year of publication
1994
Pages
518 - 522
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-4793(1994)331:8<518:TRDFCA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Background. Driving under the influence of intoxicating drugs other th an alcohol may be an important cause of traffic injuries. We used a ra pid urine test to identify reckless drivers who were under the influen ce of cocaine or marijuana. Methods. We conducted a consecutive-sample study in Memphis, Tennessee, in the summer of 1993. Subjects arrested for reckless driving who were not apparently impaired by alcohol (did not have an odor of alcohol, tested negative on breath analysis, or b oth) were tested for cocaine and marijuana at the scene of arrest. The results of the drug tests were compared with clinical evaluations of intoxication made at the scene by a police officer. Results. A total o f 175 subjects were stopped for reckless driving, and 150 (86 percent) submitted urine samples for drug testing at the scene of arrest. Eigh ty-eight of the 150 (59 percent) tested positive: 20 (13 percent) for cocaine, 50 (33 percent) for marijuana, and 18 (12 percent) for both d rugs. Ninety-four of the 150 tested drivers were clinically considered to be intoxicated, and 80 of them (85 percent) tested positive for co caine or marijuana. The intoxicated drivers had a broad range of affec ts and appearances. Nearly half the drivers intoxicated with cocaine p erformed normally on standard sobriety tests. Conclusions. Over half o f the reckless drivers who were not intoxicated with alcohol were foun d to be intoxicated with other drugs. Toxicologic testing at the scene is a practical means of identifying drivers under the influence of dr ugs and is a useful adjunct to standard behavioral sobriety testing.