Da. Evoy et al., THE ROLE OF ERCP AND LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN GALLSTONE-RELATED PANCREATITIS, Minimally invasive therapy, 3(3), 1994, pp. 149-152
Laparoscopic surgery has become the routine for elective cholecystecto
my, but its place in the management of gallstone-related pancreatitis
has not yet been identified. We prospectively assessed a minimally inv
asive treatment regime for gallstone pancreatitis combining endoscopic
retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecyst
ectomy, over a 24 month period. Twenty-two patients were found to have
gallstone pancreatitis. The mean age was 52 +/- years. All patients p
resented with abdominal pain. Five were jaundiced. The Ranson score se
verity of pancreatitis averaged 1.6 (range 0-6). Our management protoc
ol was to perform ERCP when clinical and biochemical markers had settl
ed, followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same admission
. The time interval between presentation and ERCP was 8.9 d (range 2-1
5 d), ERCP to surgery was 4.5 d (range 2-35 d) and surgery to discharg
e was 4 d (range 1-21 d). The median hospital stay was 16 d. ERCP show
ed stones in the common bile duct in five patients, four of whom had t
hem removed at ERCP. Twenty patients underwent laparoscopy. The gallbl
adder was removed in 18 and two required conversion (one pseudocyst, o
ne cystic artery bleed). Two patients had elective open cholecystectom
y (one pseudocyst, one previous surgery). Only one patient developed a
post-operative complication (pseudocyst). The majority of patients ha
d multiple small stones in their gallbladder and it was not possible t
o predict the presence of common bile duct stones prior to ERCP. No pa
tient developed post-operative pancreatitis. There was no mortality. T
his study shows that combined ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy is
an efficient and safe minimally invasive management for gallstone pan
creatitis.