C. Chevillard et al., COMPARED PROPERTIES OF TRANDOLAPRIL, ENALAPRIL, AND THEIR DIACID METABOLITES, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 23, 1994, pp. 190000011-190000015
The effects of 14-day trandolapril or enalapril treatment of spontaneo
usly hypertensive rats (SHRs) were studied on blood pressure and angio
tensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity measured ex vivo in various or
gans, Both ACE inhibitors caused dose-dependent decreases in blood pre
ssure and ACE activity, trandolapril being 30- and 400- to 1,000-fold
more active than enalapril on blood pressure and ACE activity, respect
ively. However, comparison of ACE inhibitory activities of the diacid
forms of trandolapril and enalapril, i.e., trandolaprilat and enalapri
lat, measured in vitro on various tissues, showed that trandolaprilat
was only three- to fivefold more active than enalaprilat. To understan
d the reasons for such discrepancies between ex vivo effects of ACE in
hibitors and in vitro actions of their diacid metabolites, we measured
the lipophilicities of the compounds and investigated the possibility
that trandolapril could display an ACE inhibitory effect by itself. T
randolaprilat was found to be far more lipophilic than enalaprilat, as
shown by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography studies
performed at pH 7.4 (log k(W)(7.4) = 1.487 vs. 0.108). In addition, t
randolapril was practically as active in vitro as its diacid metabolit
e (IC50 = 2.5 vs. 1.35 nM) in inhibiting ACE activity in the aorta, wh
ereas enalapril was practically devoid of any effect (IC50 = 240 nM).
Measurements of relative affinities of inhibitors or metabolites for p
urified human renal ACE showed that trandolapril displayed about 20% o
f the affinity of its diacid metabolite (IC50 = 15 VS. 3.2 nM); enalap
rilat affinity (34 nM) was within the same range as those of trandolap
ril and trandolaprilat, whereas enalapril displayed a very low affinit
y for the purified enzyme (IC50 = 50 mu M) It appears that several fac
tors, including differences in potency of diacid compounds in inhibiti
ng ACE, lipophilicity, and potency of the prodrugs to directly inhibit
ACE, may account for the greater potency of trandolapril treatment co
mpared with that of enalapril in decreasing blood pressure and inhibit
ing tissue ACE activity.