AUTOANTIBODIES AGAINST OXIDATIVELY-MODIFIED LDL IN UREMIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING DIALYSIS

Target-specific oxidation processes in LDL generate molecular epitopes that are more atherogenic than the native forms and are able to elici t an immunological reaction leading to the formation of anti-oxLDL aut oantibodies (oxLDL-Ab) that may participate in the overall process of atherogenesis. Thus, the detection of oxLDLAb, in addition to mirrorin g the occurrence of in vivo LDL oxidation, will give valuable informat ion on the occurrence of this immune response. Plasma oxLDLAb (IgG and IBM) were measured in 72 control subjects (CS) and in 80 patients wit h chronic renal failure (CRF), undergoing repetitive hemodialysis (N = 56) or peritoneal dialysis (N = 24), with an ELISA method using nativ e LDL, CuSO4-oxidized LDL (oxLDL) or malondialdehyde-derivatized LDL ( MDA-LDL) as antigens. To monitor cross reactivity of the antibodies de tected with other oxidatively-modified proteins, human serum albumin ( HSA) and MDA-derivatized HSA (MDA-HSA) were also employed as antigens. The antibody titer was calculated as the ratio of antibodies against modified versus native proteins. CRF patients had an antibody ratio si gnificantly higher than CS as concerning anti-oxLDL IgG (1.39 +/- 0.36 vs. 1.05 +/- 0.3, P < 0.05) and IgM (2.15 +/- 0.75 vs. 1.43 +/- 0.43, P < 0.01), and anti-MDA-LDL IgG (3.05 +/- 0.74 vs. 2.04 +/- 0.42, P < 0.01) and IgM (5.55 +/- 1.79 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.85, P < 0.01). The anti-MD A-HSA antibody titer was also higher in CRF patients than in CS (2.49 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.46 +/- 0.39, P < 0.01 for IgG and 2.80 +/- 1.03 vs. 1.26 +/- 0.43, P < 0.01 for IgM). Subclass analysis regarding the type of dialytic treatment revealed that the autoantibody pattern did not diff er between CRF patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Howev er, the ratio between anti-MDA-LDL and anti-MDA-HSA (a parameter indic ating the specificity of LDL over albumin as the molecule triggering t he immunological response) was higher in CRF patients on hemodialysis as compared to peritoneal dialysis (1.34 +/- 0.43 vs. 1.12 +/- 0.29, P < 0.05 for IgG and 2.41 +/- 1.22 vs. 1.75 +/- 0.78, P < 0.01 for IgM) . Furthermore, 10% of CRF patients had detectable levels of immune com plexes containing oxidized LDL and IgG. These data indicate that CRF p atients on dialytic treatment, and particularly on hemodialysis, devel op autoantibodies against oxidatively-modified LDL and support the occ urrence of an enhanced LDL oxidation in vivo.