Corruption in the judiciary and its effects on the budget of that bran
ch of government, the efficiency of justice (prompt or belated) and it
s quality (biased or impartial) are analyzed. The discretionary powers
of the Supreme Court and those granted to judges to manage their cour
ts, calendar and case load, and the hierarchical administrative struct
ures of judiciaries, which function as a queueing system, may be used
as a tool to maximize graft. These phenomena reveal links between inst
itutional forms and incentives. Using the case of Chile and the except
ional emergence of corruption within the judiciary during the military
dictatorship, the role of democracy as a punishing and preventive mec
hanism is highlighted.