Organizational culture encompasses both individual and group-level phe
nomena. However, to date, the individual-level dynamics of organizatio
nal culture have remained relatively neglected. This paper addresses t
his neglect by focusing on culture's manifestation in individuals' sen
semaking structures and processes. Building off the social cognition l
iterature, I propose that organizational culture's influence on indivi
dual sensemaking is revealed in the operation of a patterned system of
organization-specific schemas. Schemas refer to the cognitive structu
res in which an individual's knowledge is retained and organized. In a
ddition to being knowledge repositories, schemas also direct informati
on acquisition and processing. They guide answering the questions cent
ral to sensemaking efforts: ''What or who is it?,'' ''What are its imp
lications; what does it mean?,'' and ''How should I respond?'' After a
brief review of schema theory, the categories of schema knowledge rel
evant to understanding sensemaking in organizations and the cultural i
nfluences on their emergence are examined. The conscious and unconscio
us operation of these schemas in the actual process of making sense of
organizational stimuli is framed within a schema-directed, intrapsych
ic, mental dialogue perspective on social cognition. Specifically, I p
ropose that in the social setting of organizations, individuals make s
ense out of their experiences based in large part on the outcomes of c
ontrived mental dialogues between themselves (e.g., ''I think it means
this and I would be inclined toward this response'') and other contex
tually-relevant (past or present; real or imagined) individuals or gro
ups (e.g., ''What would my boss and peers think about this? What would
they want me to do?''). The content of the argument provided for othe
rs is guided by the individual's schemas for those others. I dose the
paper by discussing the ways in which this schema-based perspective en
hances our understanding of the individual experiences of cultural sha
ring, subcultural boundaries, and psychological attachment.