Dm. Larson et al., PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF MALIGNANT CERVICAL CYTOLOGY IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIAL CANCER, Obstetrics and gynecology, 84(3), 1994, pp. 399-403
Objective: To determine the prognostic importance of malignant cervica
l cytology before surgical staging in patients with endometrial cancer
. Methods: Between September 1987 and August 1993, 164 patients with e
ndometrial cancer had preoperative cervical cytology examined before s
urgical staging, which included pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy
. Results: Ninety-four patients (57.3%) had normal cervical cytology,
21 (12.8%) had atypical cytology suspicious for malignancy, and 49 (29
.9%) had malignant cytology on preoperative cervical cytology. Statist
ically significant associations were found between cervical cytology a
nd histopathology (P =.017), tumor grade (P =.001), cervical metastase
s (P <.001), surgical stage (P =.035), pelvic lymph node metastases (P
=.016), and para-aortic lymph node metastases (P =.006). Patients wit
h malignant cytology were more likely to have non-endometrioid histolo
gy, poorly differentiated malignancies, higher surgical stage, and cer
vical, pelvic lymph node, and para-aortic lymph node metastases. Patie
nts with malignant cervical cytology had a 3.5 times higher prevalence
of pelvic lymph node metastases and a five times higher prevalence of
para-aortic lymph node metastases than patients with normal cytology.
No association was found between preoperative cervical cytology and t
he depth of myometrial invasion, adnexal metastases, omental metastase
s, or malignant pelvic peritoneal cytology. Conclusions: Patients with
endometrial cancer and malignant preoperative cervical cytology are a
t marked risk for extrauterine metastases, including pelvic and para-a
ortic lymph node metastases. Such patients should be considered for pr
imary surgical staging, including pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectom
y.