Objective: To determine the feasibility of performing nonstress tests
(NSTs) in the home setting instead of the health clinic environment. M
ethods: In this prospective study, ten women were tested using a Sonic
aid TEAM portable monitor and a Hewlett-Packard device in the health c
linic. The women were then instructed on use of the Sonicaid device an
d were tested once a week in the home as well as in the high-risk clin
ic. All tests were reviewed independently by two of the authors to ass
ess agreement in interpreting the NST. In the health clinic setting, a
nonreactive NST was followed by a nipple stimulation contraction stre
ss test (CST); in the home, a nonreactive NST was followed by maternal
voice acoustic stimulation. Results: There was 100% correlation durin
g the concurrent study. Two blinded authors agreed on all tests. Durin
g the second phase, eight of the ten subjects had NSTs that were consi
stently reactive in both the home and office settings. In one woman, a
nonreactive NST in the clinic was followed by a negative CST. In the
remaining patient, a reactive NST in the health clinic was followed 3
days later by a nonreactive NST in the home, which persisted in the pr
ovider's office. Conclusion: Nonstress testing in the home appears to
be an accurate method of antenatal fetal health assessment that adds c
onvenience and potential cost savings.