A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE MINIMAL MODEL AND THE GLUCOSE CLAMP IN THE ASSESSMENT OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY ACROSS THE SPECTRUM OF GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE

Citation
Mf. Saad et al., A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE MINIMAL MODEL AND THE GLUCOSE CLAMP IN THE ASSESSMENT OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY ACROSS THE SPECTRUM OF GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE, Diabetes, 43(9), 1994, pp. 1114-1121
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism","Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
ISSN journal
00121797
Volume
43
Issue
9
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1114 - 1121
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-1797(1994)43:9<1114:ACBTMM>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
An insulin-modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance t est (FSIGTT) with minimal model analysis was compared with the glucose clamp in 11 subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), 20 with imp aired glucose tolerance (IGT), and 24 with non-insulin-dependent diabe tes mellitus (NlDDM). The insulin sensitivity index (S-I) was calculat ed from FSIGTT using 22- and 12-sample protocols (S-I(22) and S-I(12), respectively). Insulin sensitivity from the clamp was expressed as S- I(camp) and S-IP(clamp). Minimal model parameters were similar when ca lculated with S-I((22)) and S-I(12). S-I could not be distinguished fr om 0 in similar to 50% of diabetic patients with either protocol. S-I( 22) correlated significantly with S-I(clamp) in the whole group (r = 0 .62), and in the NGT (r = 0.53), IGT (r = 0.48), and NIDDM (r = 0.41) groups (P < 0.05 for each). S-I(12) correlated significantly with S-I( clamp) in the whole group (r = 0.55, P < 0.001) and in the NGT (r = 0. 53,P = 0.046) and IGT (r = 0.58, P = 0.008) but not NIDDM (r = 0.30, P = 0.085) groups. When S-I(22), S-I(clamp), and S-IP(clamp) were expre ssed in the same units, S-I(22) was 66 +/- 5% (mean +/- SE) and 50 +/- 8% lower than S-I(clamp) and S-IP(clamp), respectively. Thus, minimal model analysis of the insulin-modified FSIGTT provides estimates of i nsulin sensitivity that correlate significantly with those from the gl ucose clamp. The correlation was weaker, however, in NIDDM. The insuli n-modified FSIGTT can be used as a simple test for assessment of insul in sensitivity in population studies involving nondiabetic subjects. A dditional studies are needed before using this test routinely in patie nts with NIDDM.