Tp. Schmalzried et al., POLYETHYLENE WEAR DEBRIS AND TISSUE-REACTIONS IN KNEE AS COMPARED TO HIP-REPLACEMENT PROSTHESES, Journal of applied biomaterials, 5(3), 1994, pp. 185-190
Differences in bearing surface conformity and wear mechanisms suggest
that the polyethylene (PE) wear debris generated by total knee replace
ment (TKR) prostheses should be different than that in total hip repla
cement prostheses (THR). To address this issue, PE near debris and the
cellular response in periprosthetic tissues from 19 failed TKRs was c
ompared to that from 24 failed THRs using polarized light microscopy a
nd a semiquantitative grading system. The foreign-body inflammatory re
action in the THR cases was characterized by plump macrophages with a
diffuse cytoplasmic birefringence when examined under polarized light,
indicating the presence of multiple submicron particles of PE. The ma
jority of the PE particles were <1 mu m in size and only a small fract
ion of the total were >10 mu m. The foreign-body inflammatory reaction
in the TKR eases was characterized by giant cells with fewer macropha
ges. In the TKR specimens, the size range of PE particles was broader
than in the hips. PE particles between 2 and 20 pm were frequent in TK
R specimens; particles. <1 mu m in length were less common than in the
THR specimens. Diffuse cytoplasmic birefringence was not a characteri
stic of the TKR cases. These histologic differences were so consistent
ly distinct that the source of the specimen (i.e., from a THR or TKR)
could be blindly determined by light microscopy. The size distribution
of the PE wear particles in these cases indicate that THRs generate a
higher number of submicron PE particles and relatively few large part
icles while TKRs generate a broader range of particles that includes f
ewer submicron particles. The observed differences in the cellular res
ponses is likely a direct result of the differences in the spectrum of
PE wear particles. These differences mag in part account far differen
ces in periprosthetic bone resorption and loosening in TKRs as compare
d to THRs. (C) 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.