REFLEX RESPONSES OF MOTOR UNITS IN HUMAN MASSETER MUSCLE TO MECHANICAL STIMULATION OF A TOOTH

Citation
Ks. Turker et al., REFLEX RESPONSES OF MOTOR UNITS IN HUMAN MASSETER MUSCLE TO MECHANICAL STIMULATION OF A TOOTH, Experimental Brain Research, 100(2), 1994, pp. 307-315
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00144819
Volume
100
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
307 - 315
Database
ISI
SICI code
0014-4819(1994)100:2<307:RROMUI>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
The reflex responses evoked by controlled mechanical stimulation of an upper central incisor tooth in single motor units in the human masset er muscle were examined. The stimuli were (brisk) taps and (slow) push es of about 2 N peak force, applied orthogonally to the labial surface of the ipsilateral upper central incisor tooth. The reflex responses of the motor units were characterised by analysis of the changes in th e durations of the first and second interspike intervals (ISIs) immedi ately following the stimulus. A significant increase in the duration o f these ISIs in comparison with pre-stimulus ISIs indicated inhibition , and significant shortening indicated excitation. Twenty masseter mot or units were tested with both the pushes and the taps. The brisk taps elicited a significant reflex inhibition in 16 of the 20 motor units at a latency of 13 ms and duration of 37 ms. This inhibition was follo wed by significant excitation in 11 of the 20 units at latencies of 71 ms, lasting for 29 ms. The short-latency response to slow pushes was significant inhibition in four units: significant excitation in one un it and no response in 15 units. The slow pushes evoked a significant l ong-latency excitatory reflex response in 12 of the 20 units at latenc ies of 77 ms and lasting for 40 ms. The shapes and amplitudes of the c ompound post-synaptic potentials underlying the reflex responses in th e motoneurones were estimated. It is concluded that stimulation of per iodontal mechanoreceptors usually activates an excitatory reflex pathw ay to the jaw-closing motoneurones. This probably helps to grip the fo od bolus between the teeth during chewing. However, when the rate of a pplication of the stimulus is large enough, a short-latency inhibitory response is evoked which, if of sufficient duration, may over-ride th e subsequent excitatory response. Inhibition of the jaw-closing muscle s will tend to protect the teeth and soft tissues when one bites unexp ectedly on a hard object while chewing.