Rb. Freeman et al., IS THE TRANSJUGULAR INTRAHEPATIC PORTACAVAL-SHUNT PROCEDURE BENEFICIAL FOR LIVER-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS, Transplantation, 58(3), 1994, pp. 297-300
Recent reports document the efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic port
ocaval shunts (TIPS) for the prevention of portal hypertensive bleedin
g and have advocated its use as a bridge to liver transplantation. The
re are no reports, however, analyzing liver transplant results for pat
ients with indwelling TIPS. We reviewed the records of all adult prima
ry recipients with a history of portal hypertensive bleeding or unmana
geable ascites transplanted since the TIPS procedure became available
in our institution in July 1991. Seven of 20 recipients underwent TIPS
before transplant. There were no significant differences between pati
ents with or without TIPS in age, United Network for Organ Sharing sta
tus, Child-Pugh score, preoperative prothrombin time, operative time,
operative blood product requirement, overall length of stay, and 6-mon
th patient survival after transplant. We noted a trend toward less ope
rative red cell (26.0+/-26.2 vs. 31.8+/-38.1 U, mean +/- SD) and autol
ogous blood (4,762+/-3,335 vs. 113,355+/-20,460 ml) transfusion and im
proved patient survival for those with a TIPS. Patients with a TIPS in
place waited significantly longer for their transplant (282+/-113 vs.
149+/-113 days, P=0.014). There were 2 technical complications relate
d to the TIPS, 1 in a patient who died after rupture of the suprahepat
ic vena caval anastomosis where the device had traversed the caval/hep
atic vein junction and weakened the tissues, and the other in a surviv
or in whom the device extended into the right atrium and was extracted
during the transplant procedure. Three patients with TIPS in place di
ed of sepsis while waiting for a donor organ. We conclude that while t
he TIPS offers benefits for the liver transplant recipient, placement
of the device in small shrunken cirrhotic livers must be precise. Imme
diate benefits for the transplant candidate may be offset by increased
waiting time and technical complications at the transplant operation.