General concepts of coastal evolution of the southeastern Australian c
oastline during the Late Pleistocene involve barrier formation by wind
and swell waves during marine transgressions and formation of rock pl
atforms by chemical and mechanical weathering at rates of 1-5 mm yr(-1
). Where evidence indicates rapid change, storms are often invoked as
the causative mechanism. These concepts ignore the important role of a
repetitive, rapid, catastrophic tsunami in both coastal erosion and a
ccretion. The impact of a tsunami can be distinguished by four signatu
res: uncemented elastic deposits; boulders that are imbricated, stacke
d and uniformly aligned; constructional features; and erosional bedroc
k sculpturing. The boulder deposits occur at elevations above both the
measured and theorised limits of storm-wave action. Bedrock sculpturi
ng has not been attributed previously to marine processes but rather t
o catastrophic water flow from icesheets or ice-damned lakes, a phenom
enon which has never influenced the mainland coast of Australia during
the Pleistocene. Thermoluminescence dating has shown that tsunamis in
southeastern Australia, while eroding most Last Interglacial and inte
rstadial barriers, have also contributed to the construction of many p
resent barriers. They have also shaped the rocky coast by modifying ra
ised platforms and in extreme cases ripping enormous slabs of bedrock
from promontories and cliff faces up to heights of 40-50 m. A change i
n emphasis in the cut-rent thinking regarding the processes responsibl
e for coastal evolution is needed in coastal geomorphology to include
the impact of repetitive tsunamis which are capable of dramatically an
d irrevocably modifying a landscape over very short periods of time.