ORIGIN OF THE APPARENT TISSUE CONDUCTIVITY IN THE MOLECULAR AND GRANULAR LAYERS OF THE IN-VITRO TURTLE CEREBELLUM AND THE INTERPRETATION OFCURRENT SOURCE-DENSITY ANALYSIS
Yc. Okada et al., ORIGIN OF THE APPARENT TISSUE CONDUCTIVITY IN THE MOLECULAR AND GRANULAR LAYERS OF THE IN-VITRO TURTLE CEREBELLUM AND THE INTERPRETATION OFCURRENT SOURCE-DENSITY ANALYSIS, Journal of neurophysiology, 72(2), 1994, pp. 742-753
1. We determined the origin of the apparent tissue conductivity (sigma
(a)) of the turtle cerebellum in vitro. 2. Application of a current wi
th a known current density (J) along the longitudinal axis of a conduc
tivity cell produced an electric field in the cerebellum suspended in
the cell. The measured electric field (E) perpendicular to the cerebel
lar surface indicated a significant inhomogeneity in sigma(a) (= J/E)
with a major discontinuity between the molecular layer (0.25 +/- 0.05
S/m, mean +/- SD) and granular layers (0.15 +/- 0.03 S/m) (n = 39). 3.
This inhomogeneity was more pronounced after anoxic depolarization. T
he value of sigma(a) decreased to 0.11 +/- 0.03 and 0.040 +/- 0.008 S/
m in the molecular and granular layers, respectively. The ratio of sig
ma(a)s in the two layers increased from 1.67 in the normoxic condition
to 2.75 after anoxic depolarization. 4. This difference in sigma(a) a
cross the two layers was present within the range of frequencies (DC t
o 10 kHz) studied where the phase of sigma(a) was small (less than +/-
2 degrees) and therefore sigma(a) was ohmic. 5. The inhomogeneity in
sigma(a) was in part due to an inhomogeneity in the extracellular cond
uctivity (sigma(e)) as determined from the extracellular diffusion of
ionophoresed tetramethylammonium. Like sigma(a), the value of sigma(e)
was also higher in the molecular layer (0.165 S/m) than in the granul
ar layer (0.097 S/m). The inhomogeneity in sigma(e) was due to a small
er tortuosity and a larger extracellular volume fraction in the molecu
lar layer compared with the granular layer. 6. sigma(a) was, however,
consistently higher, by similar to 50%, than sigma(e). A core conducto
r model of the cerebellum indicated that these discrepancies between s
igma(a) and sigma(e) were attributable to additional conductivity prod
uced by a passage of the longitudinal applied current through the intr
acellular space of Purkinje cells and ependymal glial cells, with the
glial compartment playing the dominant role. Cells with a long process
and a short space constant such as the ependymal glia evidently enhan
ce the effective ''extracellular'' conductivity by serving as intracel
lular conduits for the applied current. The result implies that the ef
fective sigma(e) may be larger than sigma(e) for neuronally generated
currents in the turtle cerebellum because the space constant for Purki
nje cells is several times greater than that for the ependymal glia an
d consequently Purkinje cell-generated currents travel over a long dis
tance relative to the space constant of glial cells. 7. Some implicati
ons of the inhomogeneity were examined by comparing the depth profiles
of the current source density (CSD) estimated for various conductivit
y profiles. The CSD profile for the inhomogeneous case, using the meas
ured profile of sigma(a), did not differ qualitatively from that for t
he homogeneous case using the average of measured sigma(a)s, suggestin
g that the CSD analysis may provide a qualitatively accurate picture o
f actual CSD profiles even if one uses a homogeneous approximation for
the actual conductivity. However, quantitatively the CSD profiles wer
e different in the two cases, demonstrating importance of measurements
of the conductivity profile for rigorous analyses of CSD.