Sg. Lisberger et al., RESPONSES DURING EYE-MOVEMENTS OF BRAIN-STEM NEURONS THAT RECEIVE MONOSYNAPTIC INHIBITION FROM THE FLOCCULUS AND VENTRAL PARAFLOCCULUS IN MONKEYS, Journal of neurophysiology, 72(2), 1994, pp. 909-927
1. We have identified a group of brain stem cells caned ''flocculus ta
rget neurons'' (or FTNs) because they are inhibited at monosynaptic la
tencies by stimulation of the flocculus and the ventral paraflocculus
with single electrical pulses. We report the responses of FTNs, as wel
l as those of other brain stem cells, during horizontal eye movements
with the head stationary and during natural vestibular stimulation in
monkeys. 2. FTNs discharged primarily in relation to eye movements. Th
e majority (71%) showed increased firing for eye movement away from th
e side of the recording (''contraversive''), which is consistent with
their inhibition by Purkinje cells that show increased firing for eye
movement toward the side of recording. However, a significant and surp
risingly large percentage (29%) of FTNs showed increased firing for ey
e movement toward the side of recording (''ipsiversive''). 3. The firi
ng rate of FTNs showed modulation pursuit of sinusoidal target motion
with the head stationary and during the compensatory eye movements evo
ked by fixation of an earth-stationary target with sinusoidal head rot
ation. In addition, firing rate was related to eye position during ste
ady fixation at different positions. Of the FTNs that showed increased
firing for contraversive eye motion during pursuit with the head stat
ionary, most had an inflection in the relationship between firing rate
and eye position so that the sensitivity to eye position was low for
eye positions ipsilateral to straight-ahead gaze and high for eye posi
tions contralateral to straight-ahead gaze. 4. When the monkey cancele
d the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) by tracking a target that moved exa
ctly with him during sinusoidal head rotation, the firing rate of FTNs
was modulated much less strongly than during pursuit with the head st
ationary. In the FTNs that showed increased firing for contraversive e
ye motion during pursuit, firing rate during cancellation of the VOR i
ncreased for contraversive head motion during sinusoidal vestibular ro
tation at 0.4 Hz but was only weakly modulated during rotation at 0.2
Hz. 5. The position-vestibular-pause cells (PVP-cells), previously ide
ntified as interneurons in the disynaptic VOR pathways, were not inhib
ited by stimulation of the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus and had
response properties that were different from FTNs. The majority (69%)
showed increased firing for contraversive eye motion during pursuit a
nd for ipsiversive head motion during cancellation of the VOR, whereas
some (31%) showed the opposite direction preferences under both condi
tions. Unlike FTNs, PVP-cells had responses during cancellation of the
VOR that were as large as or larger than their responses during pursu
it with the head stationary. 6. We conclude that FTNs are likely to be
interneurons in the pathways from the flocculus and ventral paraflocc
ulus to the extraocular motoneurons. On the basis of the findings of o
ther investigators, we suggest that FTNs also are interneurons in the
disynaptic brain stem VOR pathways and that they may play an important
role in pursuit eye movements as well as in motor learning in the VOR
.