PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY OF FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BREAST-LESIONS - COMPARISON OF SPECIFICITY AND SENSITIVITY WITH CLINICAL EXAMINATION, MAMMOGRAPHY, ECHOGRAPHY, AND THERMOGRAPHY IN 249 PATIENTS
S. Negri et al., PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY OF FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BREAST-LESIONS - COMPARISON OF SPECIFICITY AND SENSITIVITY WITH CLINICAL EXAMINATION, MAMMOGRAPHY, ECHOGRAPHY, AND THERMOGRAPHY IN 249 PATIENTS, Diagnostic cytopathology, 11(1), 1994, pp. 4-8
Two hundred and forty-nine women suffering from breast problems underw
ent a complete series of tests including clinical examination, mammogr
aphy, echography, thermography, and fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Nine
ty-four of these patients were shown to be positive or to have suspect
ed malignancy. Accordingly, they underwent surgical excision followed
by histologic examination, while the remaining patients were re-examin
ed after 12 to 18 mo in order to exclude false negatives. The analysis
of specificity and sensitivity of every single procedure showed that
FNA describes the best degree of sensitivity and specificity but no pr
ocedure allows, by itself the detection of all carcinomas. When consid
ered in combination, clinical examination, mammography, and fine-needl
e aspiration have a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 49%, and
are the best diagnostic tests for a correct assessment of mammary lesi
ons. Thermography and echography showed a low degree of sensitivity an
d should not be included in the routine diagnostic procedure of breast
lesions. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.