A PREVIOUS CLINICAL SCREENING STUDY demonstrated that a cetylpyridiniu
m chloride (CPC) essential oil mouthrinse inhibited plaque regrowth to
a significantly greater extent than a negative control or a triclosan
/copolymer rinse when used without toothbrushing. The purpose of this
study was to evaluate the same ingredient combination as a prebrushing
rinse over a 6-week period. The study employed a 4 group parallel des
ign with a minimum of 50 subjects per group. Subjects with a minimum b
aseline plaque index of 1.95 were recruited. The formulations employed
were two variations of a CPC/essential oil rinse, a triclosan/copolym
er product, and a hydroalcohol negative control. Subjects were rendere
d plaque free at baseline and then rinsed twice daily before toothbrus
hing with their allocated product. Plaque was scored at 6 days and 6 w
eeks. Plaque scores were reduced at 6 days compared to baseline but th
ere were no significant differences between any of the groups. At 6 we
eks, plaque scores were significantly lower in both CPC/essential oil
groups compared to control. Although both CPC/essential oil groups sho
wed plaque scores which were lower than the triclosan group, in only o
ne of the groups was the difference significant. The triclosan product
was not significantly different from control. The results support the
previous findings that a CPC/essential oil rinse could be a useful ad
junct to oral hygiene when used prior to normal toothbrushing.