J. Siironen et al., AXONAL REINNERVATION DOES NOT INFLUENCE SCHWANN-CELL PROLIFERATION AFTER RAT SCIATIC-NERVE TRANSECTION, Brain research, 654(2), 1994, pp. 303-311
We asked whether reinnervating axons are Schwann cell mitogens in vivo
as they are in vitro. Left sciatic nerves of 50 Wistar rats were tran
sected. In one-half of the animals, axonal reinnervation from the prox
imal to the distal stump was allowed to take place, while in the other
half, sutures were placed on the transected nerve ends to prevent rei
nnervation. Samples were collected from 3 days up to 8 weeks after the
transection proximally and distally from the point of transection. PC
NA-immunostaining was performed on paraffin sections to determine the
number of proliferating cells. Axonal reinnervation was followed by Bi
elschowsky staining and Schwann cell number was determined by counting
S-100-immunopositive cells from paraffin sections. In the distal stum
p Schwann cell proliferation was similar in both experimental groups.
There was no statistical evidence of S-100 negative cell proliferation
during the study. Proximally to the site of transection the number of
small initial axonal sprouts and also the number of Schwann cells inc
reased if the nerve stump had been sutured. In conclusion, although ax
ons may be mitogenic for Schwann cells, axonal reinnervation into the
distal stump of the transected peripheral nerve does not influence the
proliferation of Schwann cells to a greater extent than other potenti
al effects associated with nerve transection.