D. Celeda et al., RAPID FLUORESCENCE IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION WITH REPETITIVE DNA PROBES -QUANTIFICATION BY DIGITAL IMAGE-ANALYSIS, Cytometry, 17(1), 1994, pp. 13-25
Citations number
68
Categorie Soggetti
Cytology & Histology","Biochemical Research Methods
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become an important tool
not only in cytogenetic research but also in routine clinical chromos
ome diagnostics. Here, results of a quantification of fluorescence sig
nals after in situ hybridization with repetitive DNA probes are report
ed using a non-enzymatic hybridization technique working with a buffer
system not containing any formamide or equivalent chemical denaturing
agents. Following simultaneous denaturation of both cells and DNA pro
bes, the renaturation time was reduced to less than 30 min. For one of
the DNA probes reasonable FISH-signals were even achieved after about
30 s renaturation time. In addition, the number of washing steps was
reduced drastically. As a model system, two repetitive DNA probes (pUC
1.77, D15Z1) were hybridized to human metaphase spreads and interphas
e nuclei obtained from peripheral blood lymphocytes. The probes were l
abelled with digoxigenin and detected by FITC-anti-digoxigenin. The hy
bridization time was reduced step by step and the resulting fluorescen
ce signals were examined systematically. For comparison the pUC 1.77 p
robe was also hybridized according to a FISH protocol containing 50% f
ormamide. By renaturation for 2 h and overnight two FISH signals per n
ucleus were obtained. Using shorter renaturation times, no detectable
FISH signals were observed. Quantification of the FISH signals was per
formed using a fluorescence microscope equipped with a cooled colour c
harge coupled device (CCD) camera. Image analysis was made interactive
ly using a commercially available software package running on a PC (80
486), For the pUC 1.77 probe the major binding sites (presumptive chro
mosomes 1) were clearly distinguished from the minor binding sites by
means of the integrated fluorescence intensity. For the two (pUC 1.77)
or four (D15Z1) brightest spots on the metaphase spreads and in the i
nterphase nuclei hybridized without formamide, integrated fluorescence
intensity distributions were measured for different renaturation time
s (0.5, 15, 30 min). The intra-nuclear variation in the intensity of t
he two brightest in situ hybridization spots appeared to be slightly h
igher (CV between 16 and 32%) than the corresponding variation on the
metaphase spreads (CV between 10 and 19%). For the D15Z1 probe FISH si
gnals were detected after hybridization without formamide and 15 min a
nd 30 min renaturation. Always four bright spots were visible and tent
atively assigned on the metaphase spreads (presumptive chromosome 15 a
nd 9). The intensity variation of each pair of homologues in a metapha
se spread showed a CV of 14 or 15%, respectively, for the presumptive
chromosome 15, and 8 or 9%, respectively, for the presumptive chromoso
me 9. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.