USE OF STABLE ISOTOPES FOR EVALUATION OF DRUG-DELIVERY SYSTEMS - COMPARISON OF IBUPROFEN RELEASE IN-VIVO AND IN-VITRO FROM 2 BIPHASIC RELEASE FORMULATIONS UTILIZING DIFFERENT RATE-CONTROLLING POLYMERS
Dl. Theis et al., USE OF STABLE ISOTOPES FOR EVALUATION OF DRUG-DELIVERY SYSTEMS - COMPARISON OF IBUPROFEN RELEASE IN-VIVO AND IN-VITRO FROM 2 BIPHASIC RELEASE FORMULATIONS UTILIZING DIFFERENT RATE-CONTROLLING POLYMERS, Pharmaceutical research, 11(8), 1994, pp. 1069-1076
Certain delivery systems are intended to release the active ingredient
in different phases to obtain the desired therapeutic effect. For the
se formulations, such as a bilayer tablet, it is desirable to distingu
ish and measure the release of drug from the different phases simultan
eously. Mass spectrometric methods were developed to measure three ibu
profen isotopomers in serum and two in dissolution fluid. The analytic
al methods were linear (r greater than or equal to 0.992) over the con
centration range of interest and recovery was greater than 99.2% for a
ll isotopomers. Coadministration of [H-2(0)]ibuprofen, [H-2(4)]ibuprof
en, and [H-2(7)]ibuprofen to male beagles demonstrated that the isotop
omers were bioequivalent and verified the absence of any kinetic isoto
pe effect due to deuterium incorporation (p = 0.286). These methods we
re then used to evaluate a bilayer tablet formulation composed of an i
mmediate release layer of 100 mg [H-2(4)]ibuprofen and a sustained rel
ease layer with a drug load of 300 mg [H-2(0)]ibuprofen. Two different
rate-controlling polymer matrices that provided similar in vitro diss
olution profiles were compared in the sustained release phase, while t
he immediate release formulation remained the same. In male beagles, t
he HPMC matrix delivered a significantly greater amount of ibuprofen (
p < 0.05). The AUC was threefold greater for HPMC (1067 +/- 437 nmole
h/ml) versus EUDRAGIT(R) (320 +/- 51), and C-max was nearly four tim
es greater(145 +/- 62.1 nmole/ml for HPMC versus 37.9 +/- 14.4 for EUD
RAGIT(R). Although T-max for HPMC (3.4 +/- 1.9 h) lagged behind EUDRAG
IT(R) (2.0 +/- 0.82 h), the difference was not significant (p < 0.05).
The immediate release layer was absorbed to the same extent as an ora
l solution (containing [H-2(7)]ibuprofen) that was administered concom
itantly with the bilayer tablet. Using the stable isotope markers also
demonstrated that the release rates of the two layers were independen
t of each other, both in vivo and in vitro. Stable isotope techniques
are a useful tool in the development of biphasic release formulations
since they can be used to determine proper drug load of each phase as
well as the appropriate rate of release.