Ma. Mullen et al., TRANSPLANTATION OF ELECTIVELY ABORTED HUMAN FETAL TISSUE - PHYSICIANSATTITUDES, CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association journal, 151(3), 1994, pp. 325-330
Objective: To provide empirical data on the attitudes of Ontario famil
y physicians and gynecologists toward the use of electively aborted fe
tal tissue for transplantation (FTT). Design: Cross-sectional survey.
Setting: Ontario. Participants: Random samples of 300 physicians from
the membership list of the College of Family Physicians of Canada and
300 from the membership list of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynae
cologists of Canada; 248 family physicians and 186 gynecologists respo
nded, for an overall response rate of 72%. Outcome measures: Physician
s' attitudes toward incentives to collect fetal tissue at abortion, pa
tient-management issues, consent issues and potential conflicts in the
supply and demand of fetal tissue. Results: Of those surveyed 75% agr
eed that there should be no incentives to collect fetal tissue at abor
tion, 90% believed that decisions to abort must be separate from decis
ions to donate fetal tissue, 94% agreed that an option to donate fetal
tissue should be discussed only after a firm decision to abort has be
en made, and 88% stated that the demand for fetal tissue should not hi
nder the availability of new abortion technology such as the abortifac
ient pill (RU 486). Conclusions: Results suggest that there is general
approval for FTT. Apparent variations between responses to global sta
tements and to practice-oriented statements suggest strategies for eff
ective Canadian public policy regarding FTT.