In the current beginnings of the mapping of the consumer society there
is an evident tension between political-economic and poststructuralis
t accounts of consumption. It has been suggested that a philosophy of
difference does nothing more than mimic a capitalist ideology of choic
e; that it represents a levelling of philosophy to the vulgar status o
f consumerism. The counterposition asserts a lack of tolerance to diff
erence inherent in the rationalism of Marxism, which ultimately adhere
s to production as its central, stabilizing, metaphysical concept. In
examining such ideas we seek to ground judgmental positions with respe
ct to the political status of consumption (and of production) in notio
ns of collectivity and action. To this end we provide a brief discussi
on of the history of consumer cooperation as a political force. More g
enerally, by elucidating the political potentialities of different phi
losophical approaches, which present themselves as opposites, we hope
to interrupt-interminably and retroactively-the development of a geogr
aphy of the consumer society which is simply additive to existing geog
raphies of the productive society.