Go. Gabbard et al., TRANSFERENCE INTERPRETATION IN THE PSYCHOTHERAPY OF BORDERLINE PATIENTS - A HIGH-RISK, HIGH-GAIN PHENOMENON, Harvard review of psychiatry, 2(2), 1994, pp. 59-69
The effectiveness of transference interpretation in the psychodynamic
psychotherapy of patients with borderline personality disorder has bee
n highly controversial. Both highly expressive approaches that stress
the value of transference interpretation and supportive strategies tha
t eschew transference work have been advocated in the literature. We r
eview this literature and identify three emerging trends in thought: (
1) Primarily interpretive approaches should be reserved for patients w
ith greater levels of ego strength. (2) Whichever technique is used, a
strong therapeutic alliance is the foundation of treatment. (3) Expre
ssive and supportive techniques should not be juxtaposed as polarized
opposites; supportive interventions often pave the way for transferenc
e interpretation. Our psychotherapy process study revealed that transf
erence interpretations tended to have greater impact-both positive and
negative-than other interventions made with patients with borderline
personality disorder. We conclude that such factors as neuropsychologi
cally based cognitive dysfunction, a history of early trauma, patterns
of object relations involving interpersonal distance, masochistic ten
dencies, and anaclitic rather than introjective psychopathology are am
ong the patient characteristics that influence the impact of transfere
nce interpretation on the therapeutic alliance. Bias toward expressive
technique and countertransference issues appear to be relevant to the
therapist's difficulty in shifting to a more supportive approach when
indicated.