Ka. With, ONTOGENIC SHIFTS IN HOW GRASSHOPPERS INTERACT WITH LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE - AN ANALYSIS OF MOVEMENT PATTERNS, Functional ecology, 8(4), 1994, pp. 477-485
1. Patterns of animal movement provide a spatial record of how organis
ms interact with landscape structure. 2. Although species may differ i
n absolute measures of movement (e.g. net displacement), they may neve
rtheless interact with landscape structure in similar ways. Fractal an
alysis affords a scale-independent measure that assesses pattern struc
ture across a range of spatial scales. Similarities in the fractal geo
metry of movement pathways therefore indicate that species are interac
ting with landscape structure in similar ways. 3. Within a species, di
fferent life stages may possess different perceptions of landscape str
ucture. To test this idea, I examined how developmental stages of a go
mphocerine grasshopper (Orthoptera, Acrididae), Opeia obscura, interac
ted with microlandscape structure in a grassland mosaic. 4. Adults mov
ed two to six times farther and were more strongly influenced by micro
landscape structure than were nymphs. The fractal dimensions of moveme
nt pathways (an index of pattern complexity) differed significantly be
tween life stages, indicating that adults and nymphs interacted with l
andscape structure in different ways. 5. Nymphs traverse the landscape
in a different manner to adults: nymphs leap between discrete vegetat
ive structures (e.g. grass blades), whereas adults move across the pla
ne of the landscape. Nymphs thus possess a finer perceptual grain of l
andscape structure; nymphs move at slower rates and can resolve small-
scale details. Adults move at faster rates across the mosaic, and may
operate at a greater spatial extent than nymphs.