Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is structurally related to interleuki
n-6 (IL-6), oncostatin M (OSM), and ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF)
. Since LIF-deficient mice do not exhibit overt phenotypic effects in
cell types known to be targets for LIF action in vitro, we examined th
e ability of IL-6, OSM, and CNTF to reproduce the effects of LIF in fi
ve different bioassays. OSM, CNTF, and LIF are able to promote embryon
ic stem cell growth and to maintain them in an undifferentiated state
as marked by a high alkaline phosphatase activity (ED(50) are, respect
ively, 0.5, 3 and 1 ng/ml). Whereas LIF and OSM maintain close to 100%
of ES cells in an undifferentiated state, CNTF, at optimal concentrat
ions, prevents differentiation of only 60% of the ES population. Murin
e 7TD1 hybridoma cell growth is induced only in the presence of IL-6 (
ED(50) = 0.1 ng/ml). Both LIF and OSM stimulate DA1a cell proliferatio
n (ED(50) are, respectively, 1 and 12 ng/ml). OSM appears, therefore,
to act as a weak agonist of LIE-dependent processes on murine cells, h
owever, with a 10-fold lower specific activity than that of LIF, which
is in agreement with human OSM cross-reacting with the murine LIF-R.
Though IL-6, LIF, and OSM all stimulate haptoglobin and fibrinogen pro
duction by human HepG2 hepatoma cells, the dose-response curves of the
se three factors exhibit very different characteristics. CNTF stimulat
es acute-phase protein production by HepG2 cells only at high concentr
ations (greater than 1 mu g/ml). A549 epithelial cells are subjected t
o growth inhibition only in the presence of OSM (ED(50) = 6 ng/ml), ev
en though they expressed LIF-R and gp130 transcripts. These data sugge
st that OSM and LIF act on human cells through different receptors. Al
together, these results indicate that none of the factors examined in
this study are precisely interchangeable in terms of their biological
actions. (C) 1994 Academic Press, Inc.