P. Axelsson et al., POSTEROLATERAL LUMBAR FUSION - OUTCOME OF 71 CONSECUTIVE OPERATIONS AFTER 4 (2-7) YEARS, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica, 65(3), 1994, pp. 309-314
We report the outcome of 71 consecutive posterolateral lumbar fusions
without spinal instrumentation. The indication for the operation was s
pondylolysis-olisthesis, degenerative disc disease/facet joint arthros
is, or pain after prior laminectomy. Concerning pain relief, 29/43 pat
ients with spondylolysis-olisthesis were classified as good. The corre
sponding figures in the group with degenerative disc disease and/or fa
cet joint arthrosis were 8/16 patients and in the group with pain post
-laminectomy, 6/12 patients. No surgical complications were noted. In
the total material 54 patients had a solid fusion, as defined by radio
graphic osseous trabecular bridging at all intended levels. One-level
fusions tended to heal solidly in a higher frequency than two-level fu
sions. For the spondylolysis-olisthesis group, healed fusion correlate
d with a good clinical result. Such a correlation could not be verifie
d for the other diagnostic groups. We conclude that non-instrumented p
osterolateral lumbar fusion is a valid method for treating low-grade s
pondylolysis-olisthesis, especially when the aim is to fuse a single l
evel. Improved patient selection methods are required in fusion for de
generative disc disease and pain after laminectomy.