INDUCTION OF OPERATIONAL TOLERANCE BY RANDOM BLOOD-TRANSFUSION COMBINED WITH ANTI-CD4 ANTIBODY THERAPY - A PROTOCOL WITH SIGNIFICANT CLINICAL POTENTIAL
A. Bushell et al., INDUCTION OF OPERATIONAL TOLERANCE BY RANDOM BLOOD-TRANSFUSION COMBINED WITH ANTI-CD4 ANTIBODY THERAPY - A PROTOCOL WITH SIGNIFICANT CLINICAL POTENTIAL, Transplantation, 58(2), 1994, pp. 133-139
Previous work from this laboratory has shown that donor-specific toler
ance can be achieved in a mouse heart model if recipients are pretreat
ed with a donor-specific blood transfusion (DST) in combination with a
depleting anti-CD4 antibody. The advantage of this approach instead o
f simply using the antibody alone at the time of transplantation is th
at the nonspecific immunosuppressive effects of the antibody have larg
ely decayed by the time of transplant such that donor-specific, rather
than total, unresponsiveness results. However, this approach would no
t be applicable to clinical cadaveric transplantation since donor-spec
ific transfusion at a specified time before transplant would not be po
ssible. In an attempt to address these problems we have sought to dete
rmine (A) whether the state of unresponsiveness established by the ant
i-CD4/DST protocol could be maintained by repeated exposure only to th
e tolerizing antigen; (B) whether unrelated or random transfusion (RT)
could substitute for DST in the anti-CD4/antigen pretreatment protoco
l, and (C) whether these two approaches could be successfully combined
to provide an ''umbrella unresponsiveness'' that could be maintained
until the time of transplant. Our data show, first, that antigen recha
llenge without further antibody treatment can maintain a state of unre
sponsiveness to alloantigen; second, that random blood transfusion giv
en under the cover of anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody leads to indefinite
allograft survival and true tolerance in the longterm; and third, tha
t once established by random transfusion under anti-CD4 cover, unrespo
nsiveness can be maintained for an extended period by random transfusi
on alone. These results suggest that random blood transfusion combined
with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody therapy might be considered as a po
ssible approach to the induction of specific unresponsiveness in clini
cal transplantation.