EFFICIENCY OF FEEDING ON ZEBRA MUSSEL (DREISSENA-POLYMORPHA) BY COMMON BREAM (ABRAMIS-BRAMA), WHITE BREAM (BLICCA-BJOERKNA), AND ROACH (RUTILUS-RUTILUS) - THE EFFECTS OF MORPHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR
Laj. Nagelkerke et Fa. Sibbing, EFFICIENCY OF FEEDING ON ZEBRA MUSSEL (DREISSENA-POLYMORPHA) BY COMMON BREAM (ABRAMIS-BRAMA), WHITE BREAM (BLICCA-BJOERKNA), AND ROACH (RUTILUS-RUTILUS) - THE EFFECTS OF MORPHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR, Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences, 53(12), 1996, pp. 2847-2861
We compared efficiencies of feeding on zebra mussel (Dreissena polymor
pha) by three syntopic cyprinids: common bream (Abramis brama), white
bream (Blicca bjoerkna), and roach (Rutilus rutilus). Empirical feedin
g efficiency (the ratio of food energy content to food capture and pro
cessing costs) is largely determined by the time needed to handle prey
, rather than by the energy required for specific feeding actions, suc
h as detaching and crushing the mussel. The highest individual feeding
efficiency values were achieved by large white bream and roach, while
common bream performed poorly. Maximal and optimal prey sizes were hi
ghest in roach. X-ray movies showed that in roach the dimensions of th
e oral gape, pharyngeal slit, and chewing cavity all matched, and thus
limited, maximal prey size. In common bream and white bream prey size
is limited by pharyngeal crushing power. The ability of roach to proc
ess larger mussels is based on the larger static crushing forces that
can be exerted by its stout pharyngeal jaws; this could contribute to
a strong position in competing for mollusks, most probably at the expe
nse of its filter-feeding capacity. An integration of morphology, beha
vior, and performance helps to explain feeding efficiency differences
among fish species and could eventually provide insights into mechanis
ms of trophic segregation.