THE STUDY OF TUMORAL, RADIOBIOLOGICAL, AND GENERAL HEALTH FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS IN A SERIES OF 448 ORAL TONGUE CARCINOMAS TREATED EXCLUSIVELY BY IRRADIATION

Citation
M. Pernot et al., THE STUDY OF TUMORAL, RADIOBIOLOGICAL, AND GENERAL HEALTH FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS IN A SERIES OF 448 ORAL TONGUE CARCINOMAS TREATED EXCLUSIVELY BY IRRADIATION, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 29(4), 1994, pp. 673-679
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
03603016
Volume
29
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
673 - 679
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(1994)29:4<673:TSOTRA>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Purpose: Our aim was to study the different factors that influence the results and complications in a series of 448 carcinomas of the oral t ongue treated from January 31, 1972 to December 31, 1986, by brachythe rapy (Pr) +/- neck dissection (181 cases) or combination of external b eam irradiation and brachytherapy (EBI + Br) (267 cases). Methods and Materials: The patients distribution (TNM classification 1979) was: 12 5 T1, 186 T2, 128 T3, 9 T4Tx, 78% N0, and 22% N+. We used guide gutter or plastic tubes technique (Paris system dosimetry). Results at 5 and 10 years are: local control 68% and 64%, locoregional control 58% and 53%, specific survival 45% and 39%, and overall survival 44% and 27%. Results: In the univariate analysis for local control (LC) and overal l survival (OS), we considered the tumoral factors. At 5 years, the LC for T1, T2, T3 are 93%, 65%, and 49%, and the OS 69%, 41%, and 25%, r espectively (p < 0.002). The lesions of the undersurface of the tongue have a better LC (77%) than other localizations (64%) (p = 0.02). For general factors, the index of general health condition, age, and sex mere not significant for LC, but proved significant for OS (p = 0.01). Significant radiobiological factors: the safety margin (expressed by the ratio treated surface on tumoral surface greater than or equal to 1.2) is significant for LC and OS. This is the same if the interval be tween EBI and Br is less than or equal to 20 days. Neither the dose ra te, the spacing between the sources, the total dose, nor Pr dose were significant, but the last two were adapted according to the infiltrati on. In the univariate study for grade 2 and 3 complications (tissue an d bone), the surface treated (>12 cm(2)), and the dose rate > 0.7 Gy/h were significant. Conclusion: The multivariate study showed that the small size of the lesion is the most important factor for local contro l, with brachytherapy alone for T1T2N0 and the number of days between EBI and brachytherapy less than or equal to 20 days. For the complicat ions, the most important factors are the total dose > 80 Gy and a trea ted surface > 12 cm(2).